The TV show Undercover Boss provides an interesting view into how disconnected management often becomes from the folks who actually do the work of the organization. Even when the manager rose through ranks to reach that pinnacle of success as CEO, over the course of that evolution from worker to manager they lose sight of what it’s like to be “in the trenches.” By taking on a variety of jobs out in the field, the CEO is connected (or reconnected, as the case may be) with what is involved in achieving the goals of the organization. He or she develops (hopefully) an appreciation for the work their employees do and the challenges they face.

What that show really tells me is that more often than not management isn’t managing.

Back in the 1980’s Tom Peters popularized the idea of management by walking around. Now, MBWA as it is known, has a number of benefits. I want to focus on two of those today: Knowing what is happening in the organization and encouraging the achievement of individual and organizational goals.

Knowing What’s Going On

I wonder how many principals actually know what is taking place in their classrooms. Do they know what the teachers’ goals are for the day? Do they know what is being done to achieve those goals?

I’ve read far too many accounts of active principals whose schools have made huge strides in achievement to discount the effect active, visible principals can have on school success. Principals need to be out there, visiting classrooms, engaging teachers and students in conversations that show both an interest in the individual and an interest in what is happening in the classroom

In my own experience and observations, principals seldom visit classrooms, much less actually pay attention to what is taking place in them, or comparing what the teacher said he was going to do against what he is actually doing.

Simply by walking around, visiting routinely and actually looking at lesson plans rather than simply collecting them in a book the principal will know whether her teachers are being productive and whether the students are moving forward in their learning.

Encouraging Goals Achievement

There’s an old saying, “nobody gets up and goes to work saying ‘I’m gonna do a bad job today."” Even fewer people start down some career path with the intent of “getting through the day.” Teachers, like many other professionals enter their careers with a genuine desire to do good. To touch the lives of the children they teach; to make a difference. Unfortunately, the ways schools are currently managed literally beats that desire out of them. They may fight the good fight for a while, but soon they realize that their goals of changing their students lives conflict with the school’s goals of “getting through the day without incident.”

By walking around and observing teachers in action, by eliciting from them their own professional goals and by sharing the goals of the school (assuming the principal has actually developed real goals) the principal can help achieve the goals of both.

Being present, being visible, being interested and involved helps the principal see what goals are important to the teacher and how those goals can be woven into the goals of the school.As importantly, when the teachers feel that the administration is listening, they tend to work harder. Perhaps most important of all, when the goals of the school and those of the professional teachers are in alignment, great things happen.

I have never read a news article about a high-performing school that did not emphasize both the importance of the school having and sharing real, palpable, measurable goals and the alignment of those goals with those of the teachers.

But this has not been my observation or experience. The school’s goals are generally vague, canned BS that has little meaning or relevance and is presented in a dictated fashion. The school’s goals fail to take into account the student’s goals, or those of the teachers.

Principals need to be sharing the vision that the school has and finding ways to make that vision relevant to the students and the teachers. They need to be listening to students and teachers to ensure that the school’s goals are in sync with the goals the students and teachers hold. The best way to do that is to walk around, sit in on classes, talk to students and teachers – and listen.

Bottom line: principals need to spend more time in the halls and in the classroom, lesson plans in hand, watching, listening and comparing. And, they need to be listening to and finding ways to help the teacher reach her goals.

 

To those not involved in the process of educating others the process of measuring success seems fairly simple: give them a test and record the results.

The problem with this, of course, is what exactly are you testing? The ability to recall specific facts? Their ability to use the information they’ve learned to create new knowledge, or solve some particular challenge? Just exactly what is that we want the student to gain from the educational process and how do we measure that?

The Right Metrics

(more…)

Photo courtesy Thomas Schilp http://www.thoschi.net

Well, I’ve never been one to routinely write, so I’m in no way surprised that I haven’t posted in … well, a long time. I’m going to try to do better, but if there’s one thing I can be sure of it’s that I probably won’t write as often as I’d like.

It’s pretty doggone busy the last few months and not promising to slack off anytime soon. The good thing is, such as it is – for I’d much prefer winning the lotto and retiring – is that I’m pretty sure I’ll have a job for another year. That would be one of the advantages of teaching in  lock-step program that takes a year to complete, and being one of only two full-time instructors. Job Security!

What’s coming up?

One of the problems with trying to write for publication on any routine basis is finding appropriate material to discuss. I’ve been spending a lot of time over the last several months learning as much as I can about “e-learning”. In that process I’ve developed more completely my points of view on education and learning in general. There’s a lot of material there, and it is on that topic that I will write for the coming weeks.

My position is, I think, very much different than the mainstream. That’s a good thing in my view since, as I’ve written before, group think – or in the case of education, teacher education – can impair one from making a fair and impartial assessment of how things are done.

So, some of the things I’ll be writing about include:

  • Holding principals accountable for doing their jobs
  • Taking a new look at the metrics used to determine “effectiveness”
  • Refocusing on the “right” educational goals
  • Quality v. quantity of time spent in the classroom
  • A different vision for the future of education

And, a number of other things that just aren’t coming to mind at the moment.

Come back and set a spell, won’t you?

If these are topics that interest you, come back to find out more.

Let me say at the outset that if you are reading this blog for financial or any other advice, don’t. I am hardly an expert on any of the topics I might choose to discuss here. My purpose is simply to share with the reader my personal experiences, observations and thoughts regarding the various topics covered.

The web is an awesome place. On it you can find any information you seek, though it may take a bit of time to really track it down. The problem, though, is that while there are tons of valid, useful and accurate resources available, there are also many more times that number of sites whose information is of questionable usefulness, accuracy and validity. The simple fact is that when you go to your local bank and sit down with a financial planner, odds are pretty good that the person on the other side of the desk has some legitimate knowledge and experience with financial planning. But, when you turn to the web the person from whom you are getting advice may not have the educational and experiential background to provide you with valid information. You are reading this blog even though you have no clue who I am, what I do for a living (or even if I actually do work for a living!) and what qualifications I might have that back up the information I’m sharing.

While I read many blogs — including quite a number that address financial issues — I take them all with a grain of salt and a healthy dose of knowledge. You can do yourself no greater favor than to actually sit down with books from legitimate publishers and educate yourself on the basics of personal financial management. Then apply that knowledge to what you read online. Some of it you might find quite good and helpful, much of it you might find to be little more than one person’s opinion or generalization of one person’s experiences into “rules”.

When you understand the basics, you’ll be able to evaluate the latest “get rich” scheme, or “hot tip”. if you don’t understand how money works, you’ll be hard pressed to understand whether the scheme is legitimate, or designed to benefit someone other than yourself.

Second, know your writer. What are his or her qualifications? There seem to be quite a few “experts” out there who are self-proclaimed, for they have no formal training in the topics they write about. Now, to give the Devil his due, it is entirely possible for someone to educate himself to the extent that he might well be considered expert — but how would you know?

Finally, recognize that what works for one person may not only not work for another but may, in fact, have exactly the opposite result. There are few hard and fast rules when it comes to money management; you have to adapt your activities to what fits your temperament, talents and values.
Having said my peace now, I invite you to read my observations, thoughts and experiences as I begin my own journey toward retirement.

One of the most interesting statements I’ve heard today was from Bank of America to the effect that Wall Street businesses aren’t allowed to pay people based on performance then those businesses will lose the best people to turn the company around.

Two things immediately come to mind. First, if they were paid for performance they would be unemployed because these same executives ran their companies into bankruptcy. They have jobs today only because of government intervention. That intervention came in the form of tax dollars. Tax dollars that came from the same people that they are now screwing over daily with outrageous interest rate hikes, imposing a wide range of fees, and thumbing their noses at with outrageous pay packages while so many are out of work (many because of the irresponsible management of these companies.)

The other thought that came to mind was in response to the argument that the top people would leave. What these folks are really saying is that this “top talent” has no allegiance to the company, but operate solely for their own benefit (which is, again, how we got into this mess.) They are saying that these people have no integrity (a fact that most us suspected.) People of integrity, already having large incomes and investments that exceed what the majority of Americans will make during their working lives, recognizing their contribution to the failure of their businesses would take it as a personal challenge to turn it around, regardless of remuneration.

But, alas, they have no integrity. They have no sense of responsibility for their actions. They have no comprehension of what their selfish and irresponsible actions have done to others. They are only concerned with themselves. Clearly they’ve learned nothing.

Next Page »